Problem
Match fraction forms to compare sizes
I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the so that the improper fraction /8 sits strictly between the mixed numbers 4 and and 5 and .
Fractions
Your answer
Watch out It's easy to also count the endpoints themselves (35 and 41) — but the inequality is strict (no equals sign), so /8 can never equal 4 or 5 .
How to solve
Strategy Organize Information in More Ways — To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 8 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.
1STEP 1
Rewrite the left endpoint over 8
Convert 4 to eighths: 4 wholes is 32 eighths, plus 3 eighths, giving .
Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.
3.NF.A.3Organize Information In More WaysThe mixed number 4 is the same amount as the improper fraction .
Why?
The 4 whole ones by themselves are exactly 32 eighths.
Why?
One whole is 8 eighths, because cutting a whole into 8 equal parts fills it with no gaps or overlaps.
🧱Whole is the sum of its partsBreak a thing into pieces with no gaps or overlaps and the pieces add back to the whole.
Why?
4 wholes is 4 equal groups of those 8 eighths, and 4 groups of 8 is 32.
🧱Multiplication as equal groupsa times b means a equal groups of b — it is just repeated adding of the same amount.
Why?
4 is those 32 eighths joined with the 3 eighths it already names, which is 35 eighths in all.
Why?
A mixed number is its whole part and its fraction part put together with no overlap, so the two parts add back to one amount.
🧱Whole is the sum of its partsBreak a thing into pieces with no gaps or overlaps and the pieces add back to the whole.
Why?
The 32 eighths and the 3 eighths are the very same size of piece, so counting them together just gives 35 eighths.
🧱Whole is the sum of its partsBreak a thing into pieces with no gaps or overlaps and the pieces add back to the whole.
2STEP 2
Rewrite the right endpoint over 8
Convert 5 to eighths: 5 wholes is 40 eighths, plus 1 eighth, giving .
Now all three quantities are eighths, so only the top numbers matter.
3.NF.A.3Organize Information In More Ways3STEP 3
Compare numerators and list
less than /8 less than , so is a whole number between 35 and 41: 36, 37, 38, 39, 40.
With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.
3.NF.A.3Make A Systematic List4STEP 4
Count them
There are five whole numbers in the list.
{36,37,38,39,40} → 5
Just count the items in the systematic list.
3.OA.A.1Make A Systematic ListAnswer
5
{36, 37, 38, 39, 40} → 5
The endpoints 35 and 41 are 6 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 5 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate, like = 4.5, indeed lands between 4 and 5 .
Takeaway
This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!
- Rewrite the left endpoint over 8
- Rewrite the right endpoint over 8
- Compare numerators and list
- Count them
Where next?
Level upsuggested
Another one like thissuggested
Same look, different logicsuggested
Step back and solidifysuggested