Practice · Match fraction forms to compare sizes · Sensim Math

Variant 1 easy

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$1\frac{3}{5} < \frac{\star}{5} < 3\frac{1}{5}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{5}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 1 and $\frac{3}{5}$ and 3 and $\frac{1}{5}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 1 $\frac{3}{5}$ < $\frac{\star}{5}$ < 3 $\frac{1}{5}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{5}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 5.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{5}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 5 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 1

\frac{3}{5}

to 5ths: 1 wholes is 5 5ths, plus 3 5ths.

1\tfrac{3}{5} = \frac{1\times 5 + 3}{5} = \frac{8}{5}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 3

\frac{1}{5}

to 5ths: 3 wholes is 15 5ths, plus 1 5ths.

3\tfrac{1}{5} = \frac{3\times 5 + 1}{5} = \frac{16}{5}

Now all three quantities are 5ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{8}{5}

<

\frac{\star}{5}

<

\frac{16}{5}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 8 and 16: that is 9,10,11,12,13,14,15.

8 < \star < 16 \Rightarrow \star \in \{9,10,11,12,13,14,15\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 7 whole numbers in the list.

\{9,10,11,12,13,14,15\} \Rightarrow 7

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 7

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 8 and 16 are 8 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 7 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 1 $\frac{3}{5}$ and 3 $\frac{1}{5}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{8}{5}$ and $\frac{16}{5}$ on a line of 5ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 7 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 5ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 5ths (1 x 5, 3 x 5) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Variant 2 easy

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$3\frac{1}{6} < \frac{\star}{6} < 4\frac{5}{6}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{6}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 3 and $\frac{1}{6}$ and 4 and $\frac{5}{6}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 3 $\frac{1}{6}$ < $\frac{\star}{6}$ < 4 $\frac{5}{6}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{6}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 6.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{6}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 6 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 3

\frac{1}{6}

to 6ths: 3 wholes is 18 6ths, plus 1 6ths.

3\tfrac{1}{6} = \frac{3\times 6 + 1}{6} = \frac{19}{6}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 4

\frac{5}{6}

to 6ths: 4 wholes is 24 6ths, plus 5 6ths.

4\tfrac{5}{6} = \frac{4\times 6 + 5}{6} = \frac{29}{6}

Now all three quantities are 6ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{19}{6}

<

\frac{\star}{6}

<

\frac{29}{6}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 19 and 29: that is 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28.

19 < \star < 29 \Rightarrow \star \in \{20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 9 whole numbers in the list.

\{20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28\} \Rightarrow 9

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 9

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 19 and 29 are 10 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 9 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 3 $\frac{1}{6}$ and 4 $\frac{5}{6}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{19}{6}$ and $\frac{29}{6}$ on a line of 6ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 9 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 6ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 6ths (3 x 6, 4 x 6) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Variant 3 easy

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$2\frac{1}{6} < \frac{\star}{6} < 3\frac{2}{6}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{6}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 2 and $\frac{1}{6}$ and 3 and $\frac{2}{6}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 2 $\frac{1}{6}$ < $\frac{\star}{6}$ < 3 $\frac{2}{6}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{6}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 6.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{6}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 6 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 2

\frac{1}{6}

to 6ths: 2 wholes is 12 6ths, plus 1 6ths.

2\tfrac{1}{6} = \frac{2\times 6 + 1}{6} = \frac{13}{6}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 3

\frac{2}{6}

to 6ths: 3 wholes is 18 6ths, plus 2 6ths.

3\tfrac{2}{6} = \frac{3\times 6 + 2}{6} = \frac{20}{6}

Now all three quantities are 6ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{13}{6}

<

\frac{\star}{6}

<

\frac{20}{6}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 13 and 20: that is 14,15,16,17,18,19.

13 < \star < 20 \Rightarrow \star \in \{14,15,16,17,18,19\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 6 whole numbers in the list.

\{14,15,16,17,18,19\} \Rightarrow 6

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 6

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 13 and 20 are 7 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 6 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 2 $\frac{1}{6}$ and 3 $\frac{2}{6}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{13}{6}$ and $\frac{20}{6}$ on a line of 6ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 6 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 6ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 6ths (2 x 6, 3 x 6) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Variant 4 easy

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$3\frac{2}{7} < \frac{\star}{7} < 4\frac{3}{7}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{7}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 3 and $\frac{2}{7}$ and 4 and $\frac{3}{7}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 3 $\frac{2}{7}$ < $\frac{\star}{7}$ < 4 $\frac{3}{7}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{7}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 7.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{7}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 7 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 3

\frac{2}{7}

to 7ths: 3 wholes is 21 7ths, plus 2 7ths.

3\tfrac{2}{7} = \frac{3\times 7 + 2}{7} = \frac{23}{7}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 4

\frac{3}{7}

to 7ths: 4 wholes is 28 7ths, plus 3 7ths.

4\tfrac{3}{7} = \frac{4\times 7 + 3}{7} = \frac{31}{7}

Now all three quantities are 7ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{23}{7}

<

\frac{\star}{7}

<

\frac{31}{7}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 23 and 31: that is 24,25,26,27,28,29,30.

23 < \star < 31 \Rightarrow \star \in \{24,25,26,27,28,29,30\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 7 whole numbers in the list.

\{24,25,26,27,28,29,30\} \Rightarrow 7

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 7

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 23 and 31 are 8 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 7 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 3 $\frac{2}{7}$ and 4 $\frac{3}{7}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{23}{7}$ and $\frac{31}{7}$ on a line of 7ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 7 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 7ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 7ths (3 x 7, 4 x 7) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Variant 5 medium

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$5\frac{2}{8} < \frac{\star}{8} < 7\frac{3}{8}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{8}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 5 and $\frac{2}{8}$ and 7 and $\frac{3}{8}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 5 $\frac{2}{8}$ < $\frac{\star}{8}$ < 7 $\frac{3}{8}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{8}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 8.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{8}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 8 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 5

\frac{2}{8}

to 8ths: 5 wholes is 40 8ths, plus 2 8ths.

5\tfrac{2}{8} = \frac{5\times 8 + 2}{8} = \frac{42}{8}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 7

\frac{3}{8}

to 8ths: 7 wholes is 56 8ths, plus 3 8ths.

7\tfrac{3}{8} = \frac{7\times 8 + 3}{8} = \frac{59}{8}

Now all three quantities are 8ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{42}{8}

<

\frac{\star}{8}

<

\frac{59}{8}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 42 and 59: that is 43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58.

42 < \star < 59 \Rightarrow \star \in \{43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 16 whole numbers in the list.

\{43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58\} \Rightarrow 16

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 16

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 42 and 59 are 17 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 16 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 5 $\frac{2}{8}$ and 7 $\frac{3}{8}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{42}{8}$ and $\frac{59}{8}$ on a line of 8ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 16 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 8ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 8ths (5 x 8, 7 x 8) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Variant 6 medium

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$4\frac{3}{8} < \frac{\star}{8} < 5\frac{1}{8}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{8}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 4 and $\frac{3}{8}$ and 5 and $\frac{1}{8}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 4 $\frac{3}{8}$ < $\frac{\star}{8}$ < 5 $\frac{1}{8}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{8}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 8.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{8}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 8 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 4

\frac{3}{8}

to 8ths: 4 wholes is 32 8ths, plus 3 8ths.

4\tfrac{3}{8} = \frac{4\times 8 + 3}{8} = \frac{35}{8}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 5

\frac{1}{8}

to 8ths: 5 wholes is 40 8ths, plus 1 8ths.

5\tfrac{1}{8} = \frac{5\times 8 + 1}{8} = \frac{41}{8}

Now all three quantities are 8ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{35}{8}

<

\frac{\star}{8}

<

\frac{41}{8}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 35 and 41: that is 36,37,38,39,40.

35 < \star < 41 \Rightarrow \star \in \{36,37,38,39,40\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 5 whole numbers in the list.

\{36,37,38,39,40\} \Rightarrow 5

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 5

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 35 and 41 are 6 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 5 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 4 $\frac{3}{8}$ and 5 $\frac{1}{8}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{35}{8}$ and $\frac{41}{8}$ on a line of 8ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 5 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 8ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 8ths (4 x 8, 5 x 8) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Variant 7 medium

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$5\frac{4}{9} < \frac{\star}{9} < 6\frac{2}{9}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{9}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 5 and $\frac{4}{9}$ and 6 and $\frac{2}{9}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 5 $\frac{4}{9}$ < $\frac{\star}{9}$ < 6 $\frac{2}{9}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{9}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 9.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{9}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 9 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 5

\frac{4}{9}

to 9ths: 5 wholes is 45 9ths, plus 4 9ths.

5\tfrac{4}{9} = \frac{5\times 9 + 4}{9} = \frac{49}{9}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 6

\frac{2}{9}

to 9ths: 6 wholes is 54 9ths, plus 2 9ths.

6\tfrac{2}{9} = \frac{6\times 9 + 2}{9} = \frac{56}{9}

Now all three quantities are 9ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{49}{9}

<

\frac{\star}{9}

<

\frac{56}{9}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 49 and 56: that is 50,51,52,53,54,55.

49 < \star < 56 \Rightarrow \star \in \{50,51,52,53,54,55\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 6 whole numbers in the list.

\{50,51,52,53,54,55\} \Rightarrow 6

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 6

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 49 and 56 are 7 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 6 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 5 $\frac{4}{9}$ and 6 $\frac{2}{9}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{49}{9}$ and $\frac{56}{9}$ on a line of 9ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 6 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 9ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 9ths (5 x 9, 6 x 9) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Variant 8 medium

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$4\frac{2}{9} < \frac{\star}{9} < 5\frac{6}{9}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{9}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 4 and $\frac{2}{9}$ and 5 and $\frac{6}{9}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 4 $\frac{2}{9}$ < $\frac{\star}{9}$ < 5 $\frac{6}{9}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{9}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 9.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{9}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 9 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 4

\frac{2}{9}

to 9ths: 4 wholes is 36 9ths, plus 2 9ths.

4\tfrac{2}{9} = \frac{4\times 9 + 2}{9} = \frac{38}{9}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 5

\frac{6}{9}

to 9ths: 5 wholes is 45 9ths, plus 6 9ths.

5\tfrac{6}{9} = \frac{5\times 9 + 6}{9} = \frac{51}{9}

Now all three quantities are 9ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{38}{9}

<

\frac{\star}{9}

<

\frac{51}{9}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 38 and 51: that is 39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50.

38 < \star < 51 \Rightarrow \star \in \{39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 12 whole numbers in the list.

\{39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50\} \Rightarrow 12

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 12

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 38 and 51 are 13 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 12 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 4 $\frac{2}{9}$ and 5 $\frac{6}{9}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{38}{9}$ and $\frac{51}{9}$ on a line of 9ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 12 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 9ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 9ths (4 x 9, 5 x 9) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Variant 9 hard

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$6\frac{5}{10} < \frac{\star}{10} < 7\frac{4}{10}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{10}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 6 and $\frac{5}{10}$ and 7 and $\frac{4}{10}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 6 $\frac{5}{10}$ < $\frac{\star}{10}$ < 7 $\frac{4}{10}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{10}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 10.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{10}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 10 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 6

\frac{5}{10}

to 10ths: 6 wholes is 60 10ths, plus 5 10ths.

6\tfrac{5}{10} = \frac{6\times 10 + 5}{10} = \frac{65}{10}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 7

\frac{4}{10}

to 10ths: 7 wholes is 70 10ths, plus 4 10ths.

7\tfrac{4}{10} = \frac{7\times 10 + 4}{10} = \frac{74}{10}

Now all three quantities are 10ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{65}{10}

<

\frac{\star}{10}

<

\frac{74}{10}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 65 and 74: that is 66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73.

65 < \star < 74 \Rightarrow \star \in \{66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 8 whole numbers in the list.

\{66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73\} \Rightarrow 8

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 8

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 65 and 74 are 9 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 8 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 6 $\frac{5}{10}$ and 7 $\frac{4}{10}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{65}{10}$ and $\frac{74}{10}$ on a line of 10ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 8 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 10ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 10ths (6 x 10, 7 x 10) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Variant 10 hard

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$7\frac{3}{11} < \frac{\star}{11} < 8\frac{8}{11}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{11}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 7 and $\frac{3}{11}$ and 8 and $\frac{8}{11}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 7 $\frac{3}{11}$ < $\frac{\star}{11}$ < 8 $\frac{8}{11}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{11}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 11.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{11}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 11 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 7

\frac{3}{11}

to 11ths: 7 wholes is 77 11ths, plus 3 11ths.

7\tfrac{3}{11} = \frac{7\times 11 + 3}{11} = \frac{80}{11}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 8

\frac{8}{11}

to 11ths: 8 wholes is 88 11ths, plus 8 11ths.

8\tfrac{8}{11} = \frac{8\times 11 + 8}{11} = \frac{96}{11}

Now all three quantities are 11ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{80}{11}

<

\frac{\star}{11}

<

\frac{96}{11}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 80 and 96: that is 81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95.

80 < \star < 96 \Rightarrow \star \in \{81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 15 whole numbers in the list.

\{81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95\} \Rightarrow 15

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 15

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 80 and 96 are 16 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 15 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 7 $\frac{3}{11}$ and 8 $\frac{8}{11}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{80}{11}$ and $\frac{96}{11}$ on a line of 11ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 15 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 11ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 11ths (7 x 11, 8 x 11) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Variant 11 hard

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$2\frac{7}{12} < \frac{\star}{12} < 4\frac{2}{12}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{12}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 2 and $\frac{7}{12}$ and 4 and $\frac{2}{12}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 2 $\frac{7}{12}$ < $\frac{\star}{12}$ < 4 $\frac{2}{12}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{12}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 12.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{12}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 12 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 2

\frac{7}{12}

to 12ths: 2 wholes is 24 12ths, plus 7 12ths.

2\tfrac{7}{12} = \frac{2\times 12 + 7}{12} = \frac{31}{12}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 4

\frac{2}{12}

to 12ths: 4 wholes is 48 12ths, plus 2 12ths.

4\tfrac{2}{12} = \frac{4\times 12 + 2}{12} = \frac{50}{12}

Now all three quantities are 12ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{31}{12}

<

\frac{\star}{12}

<

\frac{50}{12}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 31 and 50: that is 32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49.

31 < \star < 50 \Rightarrow \star \in \{32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 18 whole numbers in the list.

\{32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49\} \Rightarrow 18

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 18

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 31 and 50 are 19 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 18 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 2 $\frac{7}{12}$ and 4 $\frac{2}{12}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{31}{12}$ and $\frac{50}{12}$ on a line of 12ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 18 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 12ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 12ths (2 x 12, 4 x 12) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Variant 12 hard

How many whole numbers can go in the $\star$ ?

$2\frac{5}{14} < \frac{\star}{14} < 3\frac{9}{14}$

Your answer

Show solution

1 · Understandwhat's really being asked

I need to count how many whole numbers can replace the $\star$ so that the improper fraction $\frac{\star}{14}$ sits strictly between the mixed numbers 2 and $\frac{5}{14}$ and 3 and $\frac{9}{14}$ .

Givens

The inequality is 2 $\frac{5}{14}$ < $\frac{\star}{14}$ < 3 $\frac{9}{14}$ .
The middle quantity is $\frac{\star}{14}$ , where $\star$ is a whole number.
Both ends are mixed numbers with denominator 14.

Unknowns

How many whole numbers $\star$ make the inequality true.

Constraints

$\star$ must be a whole number.
The inequality is strict, so $\frac{\star}{14}$ cannot equal either endpoint.

2 · Planchoose the strategy

#15 Organize Information in More Ways · also uses: #2 Make a Systematic List

To compare fairly, rewrite both mixed-number endpoints as improper fractions over 14 so every quantity has the same denominator. Then the numerators can be compared directly and the valid whole numbers listed.

3 · Execute4 carry out the plan

1Rewrite the left endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 2

\frac{5}{14}

to 14ths: 2 wholes is 28 14ths, plus 5 14ths.

2\tfrac{5}{14} = \frac{2\times 14 + 5}{14} = \frac{33}{14}

Matching denominators lets us compare fractions just by their numerators.

2Rewrite the right endpoint

#15 Organize Information in More Ways 3.NF.A.3

Convert 3

\frac{9}{14}

to 14ths: 3 wholes is 42 14ths, plus 9 14ths.

3\tfrac{9}{14} = \frac{3\times 14 + 9}{14} = \frac{51}{14}

Now all three quantities are 14ths, so only the top numbers matter.

3Compare numerators and list

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.NF.A.3

The inequality becomes

\frac{33}{14}

<

\frac{\star}{14}

<

\frac{51}{14}

, so

\star

must be a whole number strictly between 33 and 51: that is 34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50.

33 < \star < 51 \Rightarrow \star \in \{34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50\}

With equal denominators, comparing fractions is the same as comparing whole-number numerators.

4Count them

#2 Make a Systematic List 3.OA.A.1

There are 17 whole numbers in the list.

\{34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50\} \Rightarrow 17

Just count the items in the systematic list.

Answer: 17

4 · Reviewdoes it hold up?

The endpoints 33 and 51 are 18 apart; excluding both ends leaves the 17 whole numbers in between, which matches the count. Each candidate lands strictly between 2 $\frac{5}{14}$ and 3 $\frac{9}{14}$ .

Another way: Number-line reasoning (tool 1): mark $\frac{33}{14}$ and $\frac{51}{14}$ on a line of 14ths; the whole-number numerators strictly between them give the same 17 values.

Standardsmin grade 3

3.NF.A.3 Explain equivalence of fractions and compare fractions by reasoning — Converting mixed numbers to 14ths so the fractions can be compared by numerator.
3.OA.A.1 Interpret products of whole numbers as total number of objects in groups — Converting whole parts to 14ths (2 x 14, 3 x 14) and counting the valid values.

💡Takeaway. This only needs Grade 3 fraction sense: make the bottoms match, then just compare the top numbers!

Match fraction forms to compare sizes · 12 practice problems

Generated variants — 12

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Givens

Unknowns

Constraints

Where next?