Solve multi-step decimal problems in order · 12 practice problems

Evan's 1.32 is a little under 0.9 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 2.244 is 1.7 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(1.8 \times 0.9 - 0.3) \times 1.7$, gives Jacob's 2.244 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.

Evan's 1.13 is a little under 0.7 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 2.034 is 1.8 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(1.9 \times 0.7 - 0.2) \times 1.8$, gives Jacob's 2.034 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.

Evan's 1.25 is a little under 0.9 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 2.5 is 2 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(1.5 \times 0.9 - 0.1) \times 2$, gives Jacob's 2.5 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.

Evan's 1.18 is a little under 0.8 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 1.77 is 1.5 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(2.1 \times 0.8 - 0.5) \times 1.5$, gives Jacob's 1.77 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.

Evan's 1.62 is a little under 0.8 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 2.592 is 1.6 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(2.4 \times 0.8 - 0.3) \times 1.6$, gives Jacob's 2.592 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.

Evan's 0.92 is a little under 0.7 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 2.208 is 2.4 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(1.6 \times 0.7 - 0.2) \times 2.4$, gives Jacob's 2.208 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.

Evan's 1.05 is a little under 0.5 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 2.73 is 2.6 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(2.7 \times 0.5 - 0.3) \times 2.6$, gives Jacob's 2.73 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.

Evan's 1.4 is a little under 0.6 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 3.92 is 2.8 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(2.5 \times 0.6 - 0.1) \times 2.8$, gives Jacob's 3.92 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.

Evan's 1.2 is a little under 0.5 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 3.6 is 3 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(2.8 \times 0.5 - 0.2) \times 3$, gives Jacob's 3.6 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.

Evan's 1.7 is a little under 0.8 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 3.23 is 1.9 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(3 \times 0.8 - 0.7) \times 1.9$, gives Jacob's 3.23 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.

Evan's 1.52 is a little under 0.6 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 3.8 is 2.5 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(3.2 \times 0.6 - 0.4) \times 2.5$, gives Jacob's 3.8 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.

Evan's 1.92 is a little under 0.7 times Nami's, as the wording says, and Jacob's 4.224 is 2.2 times that -- each step is the right size.

Another way: Chaining it into one expression, $(3.6 \times 0.7 - 0.6) \times 2.2$, gives Jacob's 4.224 in a single line, but hides the two intermediate distances the question compares.