Patterns & Reasoning

Depth · one concept from first principles · step 2 of 4

Overlaps are one fewer than the strips

You want to join 55 strips of tape, each 26 cm26 \text{ cm} long, by overlapping them by the same amount as shown in the figure, to make one long tape that is 1 m 10 cm1 \text{ m } 10 \text{ cm} long. By how many cm\text{cm} should each overlap be?

26 cm 26 cm A
Measurement & dataOperations
Your answer
cm
How to solve
Strategy Draw a Diagram — The figure shows that joining strips makes them overlap, and the key pattern is that the number of overlaps is one fewer than the number of strips. The total length lost equals the combined overlaps, which we then split equally.
1STEP 1

Total length of the separate strips

Add up all 5 strips before any overlapping: 5 strips of 26 cm.

5 × 26 = 130 cm
2STEP 2

Convert the final length and find what was lost

The finished tape is 110 cm. Overlapping makes it shorter, so the amount lost is the separate total minus the final length.

130 - 110 = 20 cm
3STEP 3

Count the overlaps

The orange regions sit between neighboring strips. With 5 strips there are 4 such overlaps (one fewer than the number of strips).

5 - 1 = 4
4STEP 4

Find each overlap

The 20 cm of hidden tape is shared equally among the 4 overlaps.

20 ÷ 4 = 5 cm
Answer
5 cm
20 ÷ 4 = 5 cm
With 5 cm overlaps: total 130 cm minus 4 overlaps times 5 cm = 130 - 20 = 110 cm = 1 m 10 cm, matching the target. An overlap of 5 cm is smaller than a 26 cm strip, which is sensible.
Takeaway

When you overlap strips in a row, the overlaps are always one fewer than the strips, so the hidden length just splits evenly among them!

  • Total length of the separate strips
  • Convert the final length and find what was lost
  • Count the overlaps
  • Find each overlap
Where next?
Another one like thissuggested
Same look, different logicsuggested
Step back and solidifysuggested

A parent dashboard for the family lives at sensimlab.com.

▶ Practice — 9 problems

The same shape shows up later on the AMC, as Arithmetic Expression Decomposition. Why the shapes repeat →